Hi, and thank you for responding. One question though, what do you suggest I
put for on the inbound rule where it asked to the external port range I have
it set to 80, however when I do this and select "Auto-add a firewall rule to
permit traffic through this NAT rule" at the bottom of the screen, it sets
up a firewall rule as follows:
Proto Source Port Destination Port Description
TCP * * 192.168.1.100 80 (HTTP) NATed IIS Rule
Which is correct? Do you see my confusion?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Anderson" <tom at haremail dot net>
To: "Joe Rodiguez Jr." <jrodriguezjr at gmail dot com>; <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Webserver behind MonoWall
> You need to set the source port to any, not 80.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Rodiguez Jr." <jrodriguezjr at gmail dot com>
> To: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:49 PM
> Subject: [m0n0wall] Webserver behind MonoWall
> > Hi All,
> > I have been searching high and low for an answer to this question in the
> > list and have not come to a definitive answer.
> > I have a group of static IP's that have been assigned to me and I am
> > trying
> > to do a NAT for one of these IP's to an internal webserver with an
> > of 192.168.1.10.
> > At this point I have set up a Server NAT address and inbound rules as
> > follows:
> > If Proto Ext. port range NAT IP Int. port range Description
> > WAN TCP 21 (FTP) 192.168.1.10
> > (ext.: 24.173.XXX.XXX) 21 (FTP) Test FTP Server
> > WAN TCP 80 (HTTP) 192.168.1.10
> > (ext.: 24.173.XXX.XXX) 80 (HTTP) IIS Rule
> > Now the FTP rule works great. The HTTP one however does not work at
> > I
> > can not seem to try get the web server to NAT correctly.
> > Anyone know what I am doing wrong?
> > Your help is greatly appreciated.
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 9/30/2005