Chris Buechler wrote:
>It's our sneaky way of getting you to tell us which OS is best suited
>for your wants. You might select that you think it should be OpenBSD,
>but select that wireless card support and high throughput are your two
>most critical features (in which case you're contradicting yourself,
>but most users won't realize that). Things like that.
I would have appreciated a "don't care" option -- I don't care about the
OS, I care about things like high throughput, disaster recovery, ease of
use, ease of troubleshooting, hardware support (mostly just that it
plays nice on whatever hardware I happen to find laying around),
performance on inadequate hardware.
You can base it off of OS/2 Warp for all I care, if it meets everybody's
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?