Chris Buechler wrote:

>It's our sneaky way of getting you to tell us which OS is best suited
>for your wants.  You might select that you think it should be OpenBSD,
>but select that wireless card support and high throughput are your two
>most critical features (in which case you're contradicting yourself,
>but most users won't realize that).  Things like that.
>  
>
I would have appreciated a "don't care" option -- I don't care about the 
OS, I care about things like high throughput, disaster recovery, ease of 
use, ease of troubleshooting, hardware support (mostly just that it 
plays nice on whatever hardware I happen to find laying around), 
performance on inadequate hardware.

You can base it off of OS/2 Warp for all I care, if it meets everybody's 
needs.

-- 
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?