Chris Buechler wrote:
> On 10/27/05, William Arlofski <waa dash m0n0wall at revpol dot com> wrote:
>>Hi James... Next time you should telnet to the standard SMTP port of 25
>>instead of 24. :)
> you missed the part where he said the mail server is configured on 24.
> (to avoid being directly accessible/easy to find from the Internet
> for spammers, since the MX's point to a service provider).
Yup Chris, I really did miss that. :-/ I think I must have
accidentally deleted the first portion of the thread. I was sure I had
seen the beginning though. Oops.