"Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
To:
"Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
Cc:
<m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Subject:
RE: [m0n0wall] NATed services
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:08:01 +0100
>no it's not. that's a very common limitation of virtually every
>commercial firewall too. not serious at all, it's trivial to work
>around.
Except for checkpoint and linux iptables
J.
