[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] NATed services
 Date:  Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:08:01 +0100
>no it's not.  that's a very common limitation of virtually every
>commercial firewall too.  not serious at all, it's trivial to work
>around.
Except for checkpoint and linux iptables

J.