|
||||||||||
Jean Everson Martina wrote: > Typically 3DES is the best choice for site to site > >> between m0n0wall and some other IPsec device, for interoperability >> purposes. For software encryption (i.e. no hardware crypto card), >> Blowfish is by far the fastest. If you switched to 3DES, you'd see a >> marked decrease in throughput (and/or increase in CPU utilization). > > > Hi all, > > > I researched on this area for sometime. I have made some testing > using site-to-site tunnels, and for sure, blowfish is the best > relation between throughput and CPU utilization. Other things that is > very interesting is that with blowfish, no matter what the the key > size is, it works faster than other algorithims in software and in > hardware(using same specs hardware) with the same key size. > But people does not use it very much because it is not the NIST > standard.... support for the VIA AES accelerators appears to be either in, or very close in FreeBSD 6.0. Perhaps a future version of m0n0wall will be based on same, or someone will "backport" the Via Padlock support to 4.11. Jim |