[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Jim Thompson <jim at netgate dot com>
 Cc:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] False sense of (IPsec)urity?
 Date:  Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:47:26 +0800
On 11/09/05 08:10 Jim Thompson said the following:
> So, it will all get tested, and fixed if necessary, and either m0n0wall 
> will go to 6.0 or the Padlock support will get backported to 4.11.  

i doubt padlock support will be backported to 4.11, given the recent 
release of 6.0-RELEASE. i think the 4.x branch will be left for decay in a 
while, with only bugfix/security updates.

> Either way, m0n0wall should be able to pickup support for the fastest 
> (for the money) AES accelerator I can find, which can only help IPSEC 

i'm experimenting with porting over m0n0wall to 6.0 to see if that makes 
any difference. i should have a beta image out by the weekend for prelim 
testing. note this is just a prototype and is adjunct to the M0n0wall 
future discussion we had on these here lists.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |