On 11/09/05 08:10 Jim Thompson said the following:
> So, it will all get tested, and fixed if necessary, and either m0n0wall
> will go to 6.0 or the Padlock support will get backported to 4.11.
i doubt padlock support will be backported to 4.11, given the recent
release of 6.0-RELEASE. i think the 4.x branch will be left for decay in a
while, with only bugfix/security updates.
> Either way, m0n0wall should be able to pickup support for the fastest
> (for the money) AES accelerator I can find, which can only help IPSEC
i'm experimenting with porting over m0n0wall to 6.0 to see if that makes
any difference. i should have a beta image out by the weekend for prelim
testing. note this is just a prototype and is adjunct to the M0n0wall
future discussion we had on these here lists.
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done |