Am Samstag, den 19.11.2005, 19:43 -0500 schrieb Chris Buechler:

> somebody changed something on the Cisco.  My first guess is they
> disabled NAT-T.
Looking at the blocked packets this is my guess, too. Maybe worth a try
to use NAT-T via port 10000 tcp (although I can't recommend using it,
UDP is much better than TCP for tunneling traffic).

BR,
  PIT



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 copyleft(c) by |           I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody. It
 Peter Allgeyer |   _-_     doesn't generate revenue. (Dave '-ddt->`
                | 0(o_o)0   Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux)
---------------oOO--(_)--OOo-----------------------------------------------