|
||||||||
Hello readers, This is my first posting here. I've browsed the FAQs and the archives but couldn't find an answer, although I suspect this is a trivial issue. So I'm hoping for some wisdom here. I'm using M0n0wall (generic-pc-cdrom v1.2) to provide an authentication portal to wireless users in the university. Both LAN and WAN use real IPs, traffic is routed (no bridging), LAN and WAN are in different IP subnets. All works very nicely (I'm still wondering how such a great thing can fit in 6 megs!) except that no connections from the university's main network (i.e. the WAN) to wireless users (i.e. the LAN) is allowed. I *can* ping IPs on LAN from WAN, but I can't establish any kind of TCP connection to them. That's a pain, because our central a/v software (Trend Micro's OSCE) relies on server->client TCP connections to "push" updates (among other reasons). I have added very permissive rules on both sides of the firewall (basically allow "* * * * *") to rule out filtering problems. I can see the incoming connection from an IP on WAN pass through and reach the client on LAN, but the return packet is blocked (LAN->WAN). This is confirmed when I enable firewall events in Diagnostics -> Logs -> Settings. I can see the log entries for the dropped return packet. The only reference to this I've found is http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/faq-no-nat.html. I've enabled 'advanced outbound NAT' as advised, but this has made no change. I'm note sure how it would anyway, since I don't use NAT at all. A sanitized copy of the output of status.php can be found at: http://stweb.ait.ac.th/~alain/Output_of_status.php.html (I've tried to attach it, but the mailing list manager doesn't allow postings > 30k) LAN is 222.222.64.0/23 WAN is 222.222.64.48/30 As you may notice, there's a small "hack": I've hand-edited the config.xml file to add IP subnets to the list of exceptions to the portal. The web GUI doesn't let me do this. I can't really imagine that's the root of my problem, but if it is, please tell me. Why do I still have NAT taking place? (output of 'ipnat -lv') Is there any way I can disable NAT completely? Thanks in advance for any hint, Greets, _Alain_ |