At 10:27 AM 12/13/2005, Jason Brunk wrote:
>I think this would be great, especially if you can tell monowall where the
>cache server is.  If its all transparent that would be awesome.  I used to
>have an openbsd box that did transparent cache and it was great, I used
>pfsense because it did cache, but lacked in a lot of other areas.  Pfsense
>has it as part of the core system.  But I like your idea of a separate
>appliance.


My personal opinion: Keep it separate, a dedicated system image. I moved 
back to m0n0wall from pfsense because I run in a WRAP platform and pfsense 
was becoming non-optimized for the WRAP platform. I like m0n0wall small, 
fast, and optimized for my embedded platform. I wouldn't mind running a 
m0n0cache on a separate box, however.



--
w dot plein at gmail dot com