[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Benjamin H. Henry" <m0n0wall at id3a dot net>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall survey
 Date:  Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:36:52 -0500
I would really like and could use something like #3. If that is not
possible, #1 would still be useful.

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:46, Honson, Steven N wrote:
> > What type of captive portal would everyone be keen to get going?
> >
> > 1) A simple one that just has an AUP that you have to agree on before
> > being given net access.
> >
> > 2) Or something like a NoCatAuth Gateway that can talk to a remote
> > NoCatAuth Server and do accounting and auth and whatnot.
> >
> > 3) A completely m0n0wall based portal that does auth and accounting using
> > a local user database and logs the accounting to a remote syslog server?
> >
> > 4) None of the above.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steven