[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  <eric at austinconventioncenter dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] multiple ipsec vpn users behind monowall
 Date:  Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:09:36 +0100
This issue is only when your ipsec terminator doesn't support NAT-T
(most vendors do)

PPTP is still an issue.

J.

-- 
Jonathan De Graeve
Network/System Administrator
Imelda vzw
Informatica Dienst
015/50.52.98
jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be

---------
Always read the manual for the correct way to do things because the
number of incorrect ways to do things is almost infinite
---------

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: eric at austinconventioncenter dot com
[mailto:eric at austinconventioncenter dot com] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 16 december 2005 19:02
Aan: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Onderwerp: [m0n0wall] multiple ipsec vpn users behind monowall

I've read thru the lists & emails and it sounds like the possibility of
having more than one vpn user behind monowall is slim & or none.

I'm new to *BSD, but have worked on linux for some time now, and this
issue seems to be a common one to netfilter.

Both the Cisco PIX & newer versions of linksys allow multiple
simultaenous
 ipsec vpn sessions, but they are proprietary.

I'm under the impression that this is the port 500 udp issue in which
iptables does not assign an alternate port when 500 is occupied.

Has anyone found a work around for this?

thanks

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch