[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jim" <jwells at networksisp dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] PPOE Supported ?
 Date:  Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:10:52 -0500
Actually the Efficient 5360 is only a 10MB device and the NIC is a 10/100 
that is why the 10MB link

Thanks

Jim


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raylund Lai" <raylund dot lai at kankanwoo dot com>
Cc: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] PPOE Supported ?


> may be he's using 10mb nic for wan and opt?  -raylund
>
> taharka wrote:
>
>>How do,
>>
>>On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:00 -0500, Jim wrote:
>>
>>>taharka,
>>>
>>>Thanks for letting me know. I don't know why we can't get m0n0wall 
>>>working on DSL ppoe here.
>>>I have just now got it working with IPCOP ppoe same hardware and I am 
>>>sending this e-mail
>>>via the DSL connection. Working very well
>>>
>>
>>I switched from IPCOP/Smoothwall to m0n0wall using the same hardware,
>>with no problems at all. Still use both for dial-up as m0n0wall is for
>>broadband only.
>>
>>
>>>I am using the Efficient Networks 5360 that only runs in bridge mode, 
>>>tried Westell as well same symptom very very slow connection
>>>
>>
>>Now that's interesting information. My ISP claims those two modems work
>>on two different DSLAMS.
>>
>>
>>>anything else you care to share that could shed some light on this ? Who 
>>>is your DSL provider ?
>>>
>>
>>My DSL provider/ISP at the moment (soon to change hands again for the
>>third time in ~4 yrs.)is Altell.
>>
>>
>>>Care to share the section of your config so I can compare. What version 
>>>of m0nowall are you on ?
>>>
>>
>>I'm running the same version/platform that you're running at the moment.
>>I also use CDROM version 1.2b7.
>>
>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Jim
>>>
>>
>>BTW, I reread your status.php posting & it looks like there is a problem
>>with the NIC cards.
>>
>>
>>>fxp0: flags=9843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,LINK0,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>> options=40<POLLING>
>>> inet 192.168.225.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >192.168.225.255
>>> ether 00:d0:b7:a6:b4:e8
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>>> status: active
>>>rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>> options=40<POLLING>
>>> ether 00:e0:7d:b3:bf:5b
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
>>> status: active
>>>rl1: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>> options=40<POLLING>
>>> ether 00:e0:7d:b4:f5:e8
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
>>> status: no carrier
>>>
>>
>>If, rl0: is your WAN interface, it should be running (100baseTX
>><full-duplex>) as is fxp0: Most likely the reason for the slow speed.
>>
>>taharka
>>
>>Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>