[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  "Raylund Lai" <raylund dot lai at kankanwoo dot com>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] PPOE Supported ?
 Date:  Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:46:08 +0100
Actually, it should be 1452 instead of 1454

J.

--
Jonathan De Graeve
Network/System Administrator
Imelda vzw
Informatica Dienst
015/50.52.98
Jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Raylund Lai [mailto:raylund dot lai at kankanwoo dot com]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 16 december 2005 23:41
> CC: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] PPOE Supported ?
> 
> Have you found any abnormal data at the section of "ipfstat -v" in the
> page of status.php?  Particular at "fragment state"?
> 
> I used to have mnf8.2 before and when I changed to m0n0wall, the
> connection was slow and some web site cannot reach.  After i set the
mtu
> to 1454, everything work fine for more than a year now.  The ng0
stated
> that mtu is 1492 but as Chris said, it is the ipfilter's MSS clamping
> (if I understand right).
> 
> Cheers
> Raylund
> 
> Jim wrote:
> 
> > taharka,
> >
> > If you have followed my thread I have also used the Westell modem in
> > Bridge mode as well same slow results and it is 100mb
> > if I use the Westell alone in pppoe / firewall mode (no m0n0wall)
> > speed is fine. Also if I use the Efficient 5360 with a linksys
router
> > pppoe
> > login setup inside the linksys router speed is fine.
> >
> > Speed is not the only issue mail does not work it connects to the
> > server and just sits there logging in
> >
> > When I installed IPCOP last night on the same pc with the Netopia
5360
> > speed was great mail worked etc
> >
> > Only when m0n0wall is in place as pppoe authentication does the
> > problem show up
> >
> > I am running m0n0wall on a pc v1.2 cdrom / floppy
> >
> > Thanks for all your help and suggestions thus far
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:51 -0500, Raylund Lai wrote:
> >>
> >>> may be he's using 10mb nic for wan and opt?  -raylund
> >>>
> >> If he's using 10mb nic for wan, there lies the speed problem. The
wan
> >> is/should be connected to the DSL modem & requires 100baseTX
> >> full-duplex.
> >>
> >> taharka
> >>
> >> Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.
> >>
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>