|
||||||||||
On 12/21/05, Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com> wrote: > Yes, exactly. With no DNS, you're far more likely to lose mail than > if you have DNS but no responding mail servers. Plus, if you have to > move to another facility, you're looking at 24-72 hours for name > server changes to replicate worldwide, while if you have a secondary > DNS offsite you could be back up and running immediately after setting > up new servers. Hmm... okay... so I'll probably have to buy another server for secondary DNS. I'll give this some thought! > > What if I changed the netmask to accept 212.102.x.x for my network? > > assuming both subnets are within that network, that would work. I > doubt you have that whole /16 though, and if you configure your > network as including that, you won't be able to communicate with > anything that's actually on that network and is outside your network. Ah, yes... I figured that would happen, perhaps an idea for future releases of m0n0wall? Some inputfield where you can add manual rules without having to "hack" the system? |