[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Lee Sharp" <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Version 1.2 passive FTP NAT
 Date:  Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:53:10 -0600
From: "Forest Bond" <forest dot bond at logicsupply dot com>

>> sorry for replying directly to you, they dont have their mailer setup
>> to "reply to list"

> That may be my fault... I have mutt setup to explicitly set the Reply-To
> field.  I would think the mailing list software would overwrite it,
> though.  (That said, your email client may not handle the Reply-To field
> properly?)

Nope.  Done on purpose to keep us from the "I will be out of the office 
from..." death spiral.  I hate mechanical courtesy.  The worst is the voice 
mail maze that starts with "Your call is very important to us."  If it was 
so important, why don't you pay someone to answer the phone?