|
||||||||
Hi, I upgraded my Soekris 4801 to 1.21 and experienced the same issue with the main and aggressive mode. Here is the relevant RACOON error: Jan 4 20:43:29 racoon: ERROR: invalid ID payload. Jan 4 20:43:29 racoon: ERROR: Expecting IP address type in main mode, but FQDN. Jan 4 20:43:28 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY Jan 4 20:43:28 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD Jan 4 20:43:28 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt Jan 4 20:43:27 racoon: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode. Jan 4 20:43:27 racoon: INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation: I tried switching the Phase 1 Identifier from FQDN to both "My IP Address" and IP address with my IP typed in. Would this be indicating that the M0n0wall is expecting the ID payload from my Cisco box to be the IP address? Hmmm...Thoughts? When I switched my IPSEC tunnel to 'aggressive' it worked of course but still threw up some strange info indicating it's not working quite right. It was: Jan 4 20:44:55 racoon: WARNING: attribute has been modified. Jan 4 20:44:55 racoon: WARNING: ignore RESPONDER-LIFETIME notification. Jan 4 20:44:55 /kernel: WARNING: pseudo-random number generator used for IPsec processing Jan 4 20:44:55 racoon: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 205.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]<=>207.xxx.xxx.xxx[0] Jan 4 20:44:55 racoon: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established 205.xxx.xxx.xxx[500]-207.xxx.xxx.xxx[500] spi:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jan 4 20:44:55 racoon: NOTIFY: couldn't find the proper pskey, try to get one by the peer's address. Jan 4 20:44:54 racoon: WARNING: No ID match. Jan 4 20:44:54 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY Jan 4 20:44:54 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD Jan 4 20:44:54 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt Jan 4 20:44:53 racoon: INFO: begin Aggressive mode. Jan 4 20:44:53 racoon: INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation: 205.xxx.xxx.xxx[500]<=>207.xxx.xxx.xxx[500] Addresses and SPI have been changed to protect the innocent. The other end point is a Cisco Pix running Pix 6.3.1 and we are using a pre-shared key. Stephen. After upgrading 7 Generic PCs and 3 Net48 boxes, all is working well with one exception. In order to get my IPSEC Tunnels to come back up, I had to switch from "main" to "aggressive". Everything else upgraded without any problems and so far seems to be working fine. Roy... __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com |