|
||||||||
Hello, Private VLANs may perhaps be a Cisco way of describing a similar thing: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_5_4/config/vlans.htm#wp28122 However, I know that even some Netgear SmartSwitches (less than £200 for 48 ports) support Port Based VLANs so such a system doesn't need to be expensive. Regards, Kris. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron with Morad" <aaronc at morad dot ab dot ca> To: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Question regarding 50+ vlans on one interface .. does it work ? > >If you are looking to isolate machines from each other it might be worth >>seeing if your switch supports private VLANs. The idea behind this is that >>devices on each port on the switch can only see the default gateway (the >>m0n0wall which sits on a promiscuous port that is seen by all the other >>ports in the VLAN), whilst at the same sharing the same subnet. > > Good idea. This would be a much easier way to do this. I believe you are > referring to port-based VLANs as opposed to 802.1q VLANs. I have done > this > in a test environment in my office with much success. This would allow > Jurgen to use one OPT on m0n0 and a single DHCP server. > > > Aaron > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |