[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "James W. McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] NAT and VPN - chicken and egg
 Date:  Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:19:10 -0600
George Farris wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-01 at 13:28 -0600, James W. McKeand wrote:
> 
>> It is my opinion that having "identical subnets on both ends" would
>> be a bad design. You would need to make sure IP were not duplicated.
>> DHCPs on both ends would need to not overlap. You would only be able
>> half of the subnet on either end - so you might of well setup
>> separate different subnets... 
>> 
> 
> I'm with you here.  The problem is; I'm dealing with a different
> company on the other end and was trying to find a solution that would
> work without having to change my entire subnet here.  They absolutely
> will not change theirs:-(
> 
> All this so we can connect to their web site, and yes I've tried to
> talk them into just using https.

Is this something you are paying to access? If so I would not pay the
bill unless they can provide a method to access.

Is Site to Site the only method they will allow you to access their
network? Is this the only way to access the web site?

_________________________________
James W. McKeand