[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "James W. McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] NAT and VPN - chicken and egg
 Date:  Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:19:10 -0600
George Farris wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-01 at 13:28 -0600, James W. McKeand wrote:
>> It is my opinion that having "identical subnets on both ends" would
>> be a bad design. You would need to make sure IP were not duplicated.
>> DHCPs on both ends would need to not overlap. You would only be able
>> half of the subnet on either end - so you might of well setup
>> separate different subnets... 
> I'm with you here.  The problem is; I'm dealing with a different
> company on the other end and was trying to find a solution that would
> work without having to change my entire subnet here.  They absolutely
> will not change theirs:-(
> All this so we can connect to their web site, and yes I've tried to
> talk them into just using https.

Is this something you are paying to access? If so I would not pay the
bill unless they can provide a method to access.

Is Site to Site the only method they will allow you to access their
network? Is this the only way to access the web site?

James W. McKeand