Re: AW: [m0n0wall] Logs spammed...

From:	"M.Schloeder" <schloeder at zeitdienst dot de>
To:	Kamil dot Wencel at hvbpensionsfonds dot de
Cc:	m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	Re: AW: [m0n0wall] Logs spammed...
Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:54:45 +0100

Yes. There are two Intel NicÂ´s (onboard) running as load-balancing 
team-mode.

I will investigate that ;)

Kamil dot Wencel at hvbpensionsfonds dot de schrieb:
> is it possible that you have bonded ( trunked ) some interface 
> for loadbalancing or fail-over purposes ? I have a machine
> which has 6 NIC's ifenslaved ( working perfectly as far as the machine 
> is concerned ) but I get these messages as well, as if m0n0wall
> would see the bonded interface and all single interfaces as well.
> 
> Kamil
> 
> -----UrsprÃ¼ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: M.Schloeder (Zeitdienst W.Sorge) [mailto:schloeder at zeitdienst dot de]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 12:37
> An: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Betreff: [m0n0wall] Logs spammed...
> 
> 
> Jan 27 11:54:48 m0n0wall /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.110 moved from 
> 00:07:e9:3f:e9:89 to 00:07:e9:3f:e9:88 on rl0
> Jan 27 11:54:49 m0n0wall /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.110 moved from 
> 00:07:e9:3f:e9:88 to 00:07:e9:3f:e9:89 on rl0
> Jan 27 11:55:01 m0n0wall /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.110 moved from 
> 00:07:e9:3f:e9:89 to 00:07:e9:3f:e9:88 on rl0
> Jan 27 11:55:01 m0n0wall /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.110 moved from 
> 00:07:e9:3f:e9:88 to 00:07:e9:3f:e9:89 on rl0
> Jan 27 11:51:31 m0n0wall last message repeated 3 times
> 
> I got this nearly all 10 seconds in logfiles. What is going on?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
>