I didn't even know they were included in the new version, yours has been
working so well I didn't even bother looking at the upgrade :)

Maybe you could get a donations thing with paypal or something, see if some
people could help ya out on this cache server project.

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan De Graeve [mailto:Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be] 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 1:51 PM
To: Jason Brunk
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] WCCP (Web Cache Coordination Protocol) Support??

You do know, these changes are already included in the 1.21 release?

You don't need to use the modified versions any more :)

I could work on a paid project. I didn't hear back from the guys anymore so
maybe I could start earlier ;)

J.

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Jason Brunk [mailto:jbrunk at wthosting dot com]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 3 februari 2006 18:45
> Aan: 'Paul Taylor'; 'Andrew Lewis'
> CC: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Onderwerp: RE: [m0n0wall] WCCP (Web Cache Coordination Protocol)
Support??
> 
>  I actually emailed Jonathan early this week asking about it, he said
was
> working on a paid project and will be working on the cache server
version
> once that's finished.  I think he is an excellent candidate for doing
it
> as
> I have been running his modified captive portal version for a while
now
> and
> it runs awesome.
> 
> jason
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Taylor [mailto:PaulTaylor at winn dash dixie dot com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:27 AM
> To: Andrew Lewis
> Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] WCCP (Web Cache Coordination Protocol)
Support??
> 
> 
> There was some discussion a while back about implementing a variant of 
> Monowall that ran WCCP...  I believe Jonathan De Graeve was looking
into
> it,
> if my memory serves me correctly.
> 
> The idea wasn't for it to be a firewall, but rather a standalone 
> appliance.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lewis [mailto:andrew at coastal dot com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:17 AM
> Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] WCCP (Web Cache Coordination Protocol)
Support??
> 
> 
> (long lines ingnored)
> 
> I keep seeing "router" in your description, not firewall.
> 
> I'm generally biased against protocols like WCCP which in my
experience
> can create lots of problems when implemented incorrectly.
> 
> It seems to me that WCCP is better in a router and not a security
device.
> 
> On the other hand, I'm certainly in favor of releasing patches to see 
> whether it is important to others...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch