On 2/15/06, Bruce A. Mah <bmah at acm dot org> wrote:
> Chris, I object to your characterization that I "shot down" the idea of
> a two-port bridge. I didn't say that a m0n0wall filtering bridge with
> two ports was a bad idea...I think it'd be great if m0n0wall could do
> this. I pointed out that due to some fundamental aspects of the design
> of both bridge(4) and m0n0wall, this is hard. It's not like I created
> these reasons myself or made them up.
I didn't incinuate that you did, nor were my comments an attack on you
or what you said whatsoever. I was merely stating it as a "this is
why it isn't possible". I apologize that it came off the wrong way.
for the record, here's the post I spoke of:
> I'm sure there
> are smarter people than me on this list
You don't pay much attention to this list, do you? ;) (kidding,
kidding, I couldn't resist)