|
||||||||||
I believe I understand your point: "why spend more when you can get a cheap card that does more than I need" and I agree with that sentiment completely. However, performance is not the issue that is really being discussed, at least in my mind, and it is not the only point the writer of the driver for FreeBSD makes, just one of them. The fact that the performance on RealTek sucks and puts extra strain on the CPU is not really much of a concern if your running a modern system, although it might be if your system is strained by other requirements like email services, web services, file sharing, etc. The real issue (in my mind) is whether or not the RealTek cards flake out under pressure - in my experience they do, but it seems that there are quite a few others who have had good luck with them. That's great, but I would still want to get a RealTek card out of the way if I was having network problems just to remove it from the troubleshooting loop. Jeff Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote: > > > Jeff Buehler wrote: >> * It's impossible given this rotten design to really achieve decent >> * performance at 100Mbps, unless you happen to have a 400Mhz PII or >> * some equally overmuscled CPU to drive it. > The cheapest hardware I can easily get off-the-shelf is on steroids > compared to an "overmuscled" PII. Since most of the time they're > hooked to 1-2Mbps links, it means I've got Schwarzenegger > benchpressing sheets of paper. > |