[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Tim Vaughan" <talltim at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Question about dnsmasq vs. ISC DHCPD
 Date:  Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:00:05 +0000
Why does m0n0wall use ISC dhcpd as well as dnsmasq?  From the docs,
dnsmasq provides simple dhcp services in addition to DNS.  I would
have thought that ISC dhcpd was redundant.

I'm sure there's a sensible explanation!