On 22.02.06 12:00 +0000, Tim Vaughan wrote:
> Why does m0n0wall use ISC dhcpd as well as dnsmasq? From the docs,
> dnsmasq provides simple dhcp services in addition to DNS. I would
> have thought that ISC dhcpd was redundant.
> I'm sure there's a sensible explanation!
When m0n0wall was started, Dnsmasq didn't have DHCP server support.
That was added much later.