|
||||||||||
Peter Kulinski wrote:
>Is it possible to define more than one SA rule for an IPSEC tunnel with
>M0n0wall?
>
>
>
>LANHOME LANOFFICE (2)
>
>192.168.1.0/24 <--> 192.168.10.0/24 and 192.168.11.0/24
>
>
>
>I cant find any information doing this. I know that its NOT possible solving
>this be doing 2 tunnels.
>
>Any idea?
>
>
>
>Regards
>
>
>
>\Peter
>
>
>
>
How about using 192.168.10.0/23 instead of 192.168.10.0/24 and
192.168.11.0/24? |