|
||||||||
Has anyone had any luck with this? I noticed that if I turn the traffic shaping on or off, it doesn't seem to make a difference. If I have one download going at full bandwidth and then try to make a call, I hear a lot of gaps and lag at first, then the call smooths out. It does this with traffic shaping on or off, so I'm wondering if the traffic shaping is really making a difference for the VoIP phone. From what I've discovered in testing out the traffic shaping, it doesn't really set packet priority, only the amount of bandwidth that is shared on a given pipe size based on the weight. I've tried creating just a few traffic shaping rules where a certain VoIP gizmo gets 99 weight queue of a pipe and everyone else gets 1 weight and I still see no difference between traffic shaping on or off for VoIP calls. My theory is that VoIP traffic is just to small for traffic shaping to work with it, but I would like to hear what others think. Thanks, Michael sai wrote: > On 3/4/06, David Farrior <davidfarrior at gmail dot com> wrote: > >> I've tried getting some answers in the past on this, and I'm looking for any >> updates/additional info that you guys may have. >> >> I just signed up for sunrocket VoIP service and I want to keep the "gizmo" >> (their device they ship you) behind my router as their gizmo does limited >> routing and I've heard it doesn't do so well at prioritizing VoIP packets. >> >> So, how do I go about setting up traffic shaper so that it will properly >> work with my VoIp service? I want to make sure that the VoIP traffic can >> have as much upload speed as it needs to keep call quality where it should >> be. >> >> Thanks, >> >> David >> >> > > Prioritise all packets coming from and going to the gizmos ip address. > > sai > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |