Yes... but won't that limit our throughput when we do have a faster  
connection?


On Mar 13, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Joe Lagreca wrote:

> What about entering the lowest up and downstream connection speed you
> have encountered in the traffic shaper.  If you are on a faster
> connection, your packets will still be prioritized.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 3/13/06, Douglas Stringer <dougstringer at mac dot com> wrote:
>
>> Hi...
>>
>> I'm looking for a unique solution to an issue that most likely can't
>> be easily solved with M0n0wall.. but I thought I'd post it anyway.
>>
>>
>> We are using m0n0wall in a mobile system that is moved around the
>> country every day. At each place, we encounter a different type of
>> internet connection. Sometimes it's a T1, other times cable, or DSL.
>>
>> We have about 50 users on the LAN with laptops and several VoIP
>> ATA's... just "Vonage-like" units that give us phone service over
>> internet.
>>
>> We are looking for a way to help keep our VoIP packets prioritized
>> above our data packets.
>>
>> When we try and use the traffic shaper, we are asked what our current
>> upstream/downstream rates are. All that would be fine but we are not
>> able to modify these settings on a daily basis.. it's too much to do.
>>
>> We can put the VoIP on a different LAN (OPT) but I don't think that
>> this will prioritize the traffic....
>>
>> Anyone have any ideas?
>>
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> dougstringer  _a t __   mac.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>