|
||||||||||
16 mar 2006 kl. 22.59 skrev Chris Buechler: > On 3/16/06, Per Westerlund <p1 at westerlund dot se> wrote: >> >> The link is rated at 512 kbt/s. Typical numbers, end-to-end: >> >> Upload:514 kbit /s UDP, 300 kbit/s TCP >> Download: 500 kbit/s UDP, 495 kbit/s TCP >> >> I assume that it is the UDP figures that are the important ones, the >> TCP figures (I guess) tell me that there are queues somewhere else >> between my system and the reference site. >> > > Where did you get the differing numbers between TCP and UDP? Without > knowing what methodology is used and why they differentiate, it's hard > to say. I was using the program "TPTEST" (old version available at (sourceforge), for which I have several reference servers easily accessible. > Usually you put your actual rated line speed there, and it looks like > you get close enough to line speed that it should work that way. I used the UDP-based figures, and it worked like a charm. In a test I got 30 ms ping RTT w/o load, and 1500 ms RTT with load. After enabling the traffic shaping, applying the "Magic shaper wizard" and adding my own definitions for hated upload and download, I got ping RTT in the range 45-100 ms, which I easily can live with. /Per Westerlund P.S. Using m0n0wall 1.21, generic-pc-cdrom D.S. |