[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  "Chris Taylor" <chris at x dash bb dot org>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Access VPN terminated to LAN in filtered bridge setup
 Date:  Thu, 6 Apr 2006 00:17:39 +0200
I know you can do bridging combined with l3 routing on Linux, maybe this
could also be done on freebsd?

J.

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Chris Taylor [mailto:chris at x dash bb dot org]
> Verzonden: woensdag 5 april 2006 23:58
> Aan: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] Access VPN terminated to LAN in filtered
bridge
> setup
> 
> 
> Chris Buechler wrote:
> > On 4/5/06, Chris Taylor <chris at x dash bb dot org> wrote:
> >> What I'd like to do is allow my servers (on OPT1) to access a CVS
> server
> >> at the remote end of my IPSec tunnel. Is this possible? At present
a
> >> ping or traceroute from one of my servers gets routed out the WAN
> >> interface and lost in the colo's network.
> >
> > Yeah, and there isn't any way to change that.  In a bridging setup,
> > m0n0wall just drops or passes, it doesn't route or redirect.  Since
> > the default gateway on your servers is the colo's router, there
isn't
> > anything you can do.
> 
> Thanks for your reply, Chris.
> 
> Is this ever likely to be supported by future versions of m0n0wall
> (perhaps on FreeBSD 6.0?) or is this one of those "that's just how it
> has to be" situations?
> 
> I'll probably work around it by publicly exposing my CVS server on
> another port via NAT but I'm curious to know if what I proposed is
ever
> expected to be a workable setup.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>