[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "C. Andrew Zook" <andrewzook at pdqlocks dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Does Traffic Shaper Suck??
 Date:  Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:35:59 -0400
Actually, you may be on to something! I think I love you!!! ;-P

I set it up and will see what happens.

Thanks!
Andy

-------- Original Message  --------
From: "Marc Fargas" <telenieko at gmail dot com>
To: "C. Andrew Zook" <andrewzook at pdqlocks dot com>
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re:[m0n0wall] Does Traffic Shaper Suck??
Date: 04/10/2006 3:22 PM

> Uhmm The first thing could be defining ONE unique pipe for all the
> connection. So m0n0wall gets everything to 1.5Mbps, Then define some queues
> (or use the standard ones changing all to the same pipe) and set a unique
> rule that matches everything and gets to the highest priority queue. Try
> bandwidth then, if OK then change the default rule to be the lowest one.
> Match ICMP echo-request and ICMP echo-reply to the highest priority queue
> you have. And that should work fine.
>
> I think the important bit is the "unique pipe" as you have 1.5Mbps for
> everything you cand define two 1.5Mbps pipes for upload/download and it's
> non-sense to split it to 1.0Mbps and 500Kbps or something like that. A
> unique pipe should go fine¡¡
>
> Let us know if that solves something.
> Marc Fargas