[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Quark IT - Hilton Travis" <Hilton at quarkit dot com dot au>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Does Traffic Shaper Suck??
 Date:  Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:25:18 +1000
Hi Andy,

Your accounting software needs 10001 open ports?  THAT'S INSANE!!!  No
way in hell that would be allowed on any of my client's networks.



Hilton Travis                          Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia)                  Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT                      http://www.quarkit.com.au
         Quark AudioVisual             http://www.quarkav.net

http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders 
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks

War doesn't determine who is right.  War determines who is left.

This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient 
  only.  It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright 
     material which must not be disclosed or distributed.

                    Quark Group Pty. Ltd.
      T/A Quark Automation, Quark AudioVisual, Quark IT 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Andrew Zook [mailto:andrewzook at pdqlocks dot com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 April 2006 05:49
> Wow, didn't notice that you could change interfaces before 
> you pointed 
> it out.
> What does that mean for VPN shaping/prioritizing? The packets 
> are not AH 
> and ESP until the WAN side of the m0n0wall, correct?
> I would have to prioritize the TCP packets for my accounting software 
> package (tcp ports 14000 through 15000) on the LAN side instead?
> Andy