|
||||||||
Hi, In message <1145394465 dot 10693 dot 63 dot camel at localhost dot localdomain>, Marko Vukovic <marko at aquamanta dot co dot za> writes >On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 19:25 +0100, Neil A. Hillard wrote: >> Using an intercepting proxy is particularly nasty. I have 3500 clients >> using squid, configured using WPAD and don't have any problems. > >Nasty why? The best example I can find at the moment (can't remember where it was documented before) is: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/webcaching/chapter/ch05.html Essentially, it was never designed to work that way, which is why it's best to tell the client that it's going through a proxy. HTH, Neil. -- Neil A. Hillard E-Mail: m0n0 at dana dot org dot uk |