Hi Junior,

sounds really great for me too.
Thinks that your ideas are like watchguard implements their management
tools.
We've used the 54 WatchGuard Firewalls until  last year, and switched to
m0n0
for several units!

I think also needed were direct configuration of vpn via drag and drop
between
a couple of m0n0 devices. We are currently using 35 units with
customized image.
And it's horable to edit them all via the WebGUI. I think, when managing
more then
10 m0n0 units, it's the best to do it in a different way than using the
WebGUI.

Best regards
Claude Hecker

Tell me more about your ideas, please!

Am Fr 21.04.2006 17:46 schrieb Junior Gillespie
<junior dot gillespie at gmail dot com>:

>I've given it thought as to platform Independent, though I'm not
>against it,
>I've developed similar win32 apps. I've also started work on a m0n0wall
>Control Server that would allow for centralized management. This is a
>cheap
>method of management, but it is affective.
>
>The control server functions like this:
>
>User accesses the Control Server, can add/delete/edit/manage m0n0wall
>units,
>and enter in username, password, or both. The manage option would
>access
>remote m0n0walls and tabs, allowing for multiple remote sessions to be
>opened.
>
>Also to be implemented into the control server is bandwidth testing,
>where
>user could select units to test too, and view results.
>
>Like I said, cheap, but it is affective and would be based on the
>m0n0wall
>image.
>
>Junior
>
>
>On 4/21/06, Fabrizio Lippolis <Fabrizio dot Lippolis at aurigainformatica dot it>
>wrote:
>>
>>Junior Gillespie ha scritto:
>>
>>>Hello everyone, I thought I would throw and idea towards you. Would
>>>anyone
>>>be interested in a Win32 Remote Management Application?
>>
>>It could be implemented in a cross platform language like Python with
>>wxPython or Java with SWT. This way it could be executed not only on
>>Windows, also Linux or BSD boxes.
>>
>>--
>>Fabrizio
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>Junior
>
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>Junior