|
||||||||
> No, you cannot have pipes within pipes. You can have a queu > within a pipe and if you can identify 'hated' traffic then > just direct it to a 'hated' queue. That should do what you want. It doesn't do what I want. Let's say I have a 1.5 Mbit line. I create a pipe with something like 1.4 Mbit available downstream. Now when P2P is going on, lots of external machines will start bombarding me with as much data as they think I can handle. This means they will continuously send a little too much - then back off - then up again. If a sufficient number of machines are doing this, the full line bandwith will be consumed, and there's nothing the Shaper can do to prevent it. This is why I would like 2 pipes. If I could create a 1.4 Mbit pipe for regular traffic, and a 1 Mbit pipe for P2P traffic *within* the 1.4 Mbit main pipe, then the line would have more room to deal with lots and lots of incoming traffic. Of course having a Shaper at the ISP side of the line would be the best solution - but I don't know any ISP's offering that. :-( Regards, -Jeppe > -----Original Message----- > From: sai [mailto:sonicsai at gmail dot com] > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:16 PM > To: Jeppe Oland > Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: [m0n0wall] Re: Traffic Shaping question (Pipe within pipe?) > > > sai > > On 4/30/06, Jeppe Oland <uxorious at acon dot dezign dot dk> wrote: > > I am having an issue with the Traffic Shaper. > > It's doing an awesome job under normal conditions, but > recently I have > > been seeing a lot of download traffic on the line, and this causes > > problems for the shaper. > > > > I assume that the problems stem from the fact that the shaper can't > > really control what comes down the line. It can only monitor the > > amount of traffic, and use regular TCP/IP measures to make > hosts back > > off when there is too much traffic. > > > > With P2P traffic though, a LOT of machines will be sending data > > towards it, and all of them just don't back off fast enough. > > > > Of course, if I lower the line capacity in the shaper (by a pretty > > large margin), everything works fine again - but that's not > really a > > solution since that cuts the global traffic - even for nice users. > > > > Is it possible to create a "pipe within a pipe"? > > That way I could create a Download pipe for the entire line > capacity, > > and then a pipe within that of say 80% capacity - this pipe > would be > > where the "Hated" download queue would go. > > > > Anything like that possible in m0n0? > > > > Regards, > > -Jeppe > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |