You think it might be a temporary DNS failure? Perhaps on my side or theirs?

Manuel Kasper wrote:
> On 08.05.06 08:19 -0500, Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
>
>   
>> I got an e-mail today from the mailing list claiming that it
>> couldn't deliver mail to my account. It seems that one of the IP
>> addresses (62.2.215.148) used to send e-mail from the list doesn't
>> have a reverse DNS entry.
>>     
>
> It does:
>
> ---
> %nslookup 62.2.215.148
> Server:         192.168.200.1
> Address:        192.168.200.1#53
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> 148.215.2.62.in-addr.arpa       name = s0.m0n0.ch.
>
> Authoritative answers can be found from:
> 215.2.62.in-addr.arpa   nameserver = ns1.cablecom.net.
> 215.2.62.in-addr.arpa   nameserver = ns2.cablecom.net.
> ns1.cablecom.net        internet address = 62.2.32.5
> ns2.cablecom.net        internet address = 62.2.32.250
> ---
>
> - Manuel
>