main...

in my case -- Cisco did not like the aggressive so it goes main
but it's working very nice

-----Original Message-----
From: Tech Terapies [mailto:tech at terapies dot org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:20 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0 -> sonicwall

 main or agressive ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilfred E. Savery [mailto:wilfred dot savery at innovadotnet dot com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:31 AM
To: tech at terapies dot org; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0 -> sonicwall

I have just finished configuring m0n0 -> Cisco and I just notice that if you
follow normal procedure it works.

Just remember to set on both side everything the same for each phase and I
guess you won't get any prob. Just remember not to overlap...

Best regards

W.S:

-----Original Message-----
From: Tech Terapies [mailto:tech at terapies dot org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:25 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] m0n0 -> sonicwall

Any has configured a vpn tunnel between a m0n0 and a sonicwall enhanced as
1260?



Jan Arbona
__________________________________________



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch