[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Richard Morrell <dick at dickmorrell dot com>
 To:  Hilton at QuarkAV dot com
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] console access (was "m0n0wall feature request"
 Date:  Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:50:01 +0000
>Either approach - Soekris/PC needs to have a lockable/logged out console
>- having a permanently logged in console is a security risk, however
>small (yes, physical access to your server room by a malicious user
>means you have failed dismally in your mission to protect your network
>adequately), but it is another layer of security that needs to be added.
Hilton dude we've spent three years (is it that long ??) proving thats 
exactly whats needed - its the minimum. Without it any press reviewer 
doing a review will point this out as a rather glaring ommission for a 
high security device.