Re: [m0n0wall] Feature request which would make m0n0wall even better ;)

From:	Fred Weston <Fred at daytonawan dot com>
To:	Richard Morrell <dick at dickmorrell dot com>
Cc:	Brandon Holland <brandon at cookssaw dot com>, 'fisch' <fisch at conne dash island dot de>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	Re: [m0n0wall] Feature request which would make m0n0wall even better ;)
Date:	Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:57:55 -0500

Richard Morrell wrote:

>Personally.... I think NTP on a firewall is pointless. You don't find 
>Sonicwall, Watchguard, Checkpoint doing it. Any NAT'ing firewall will 
>allow you to use any one of 30000 public NTP servers so whats the issue ?
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>  
>
You could argue that a larger network might benefit from the reduced 
Internet bandwidth with a local NTP server, but I agree that the amount 
of bandwidth is so miniscule that it's not a pressing issue.