[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Holger Bauer" <Holger dot Bauer at citec dash ag dot de>
 To:  "david davidson" <david underscore 7872 at yahoo dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>, "David Kitchens" <spider at webweaver dot com>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] How / why is pfSense different from m0n0wall?
 Date:  Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:55:27 +0200
http://m0n0.ch/wall/list/showmsg.php?id=62/57

> -----Original Message-----
> From: david davidson [mailto:david underscore 7872 at yahoo dot com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:04 AM
> To: David Kitchens; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] How / why is pfSense different from m0n0wall?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- David Kitchens <spider at webweaver dot com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I have used the hardware crypto cards for clients
> > and the ones Netgate sells
> > are nice.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Have you tested with "iperf" or the like? What kind of
> max IPSec speeds do you see?
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 

____________
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit