I'm sorry but maybe I don't understand. I looked at the FAQ and I think
I understand. Parallel Tunnels? Maybe I did not explain what I want
correctly. I did read where you can create a vpn tunnel between to
M0n0walls. I just want to be sure that hosts from behind each M0n0wall
can access resources on each others networks.
Do you mean I need to create a separate tunnel for each network?
I want to know if by creating a point to point vpn tunnel that Network 1
can access resources on Network 2. And if this is done automatically
by creating the VPN tunnels between the M0n0walls.
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:Holger dot Bauer at citec dash ag dot de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:12 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch; Mark Gilbert
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall to M0n0wall VPN Routing?
You need parallel tunnels. Routing through an IPSEC tunnel doesn't work
as the traffic doesn't match the tunnel definition. This has been asked
numerous times before even with explicit examples. Please search the
mailinglist. This has become a faq somehow and maybe should be adressed
a bit more in detail in the documentation.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Gilbert [mailto:mgilbert at marinhd dot com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:10 AM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall to M0n0wall VPN Routing?
> Does the M0n0wall automatically hadle routing between the 2
> different networks once the M0n0wall to M0n0wall VPN is
> created? What needs to be done to ensure data can route
> between the 2 units?
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit