Carsten Holbach wrote:
> Hello
> 
> My understanding of the whole thing is, that a) m0n0wall is a completely
> different approach to the whole firewall thing than pfSense: m0n0wall is
> meant for lean&mean systems, where pfSense wants to be a full featured
> product. So, each of both has it's right to exist.
> b) is, that having m0n0wall running with FreeBSD 6.1 brings the
> advantage of much more hardware support, which alone is worth the work
> in my eyes.
> 
> Just my two cents
> Carsten Holbach
> 
> 
> 
> Philippe Lang schrieb:
>> Since the pfSense team has just released its candidate 1, which is
>> based on FreeBSD 6.1, what is the real advantage of having Monowall
>> 1.22 ported on FreeBSD 6.1? Isn't that doing things twice? Shouldn't
>> there be some sort of migration solution for Monowall users instead?
>>
>> ---------------
>> Philippe Lang
>> Attik System
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
To add, pfsense runs quite a bit slower and just didnt perform as m0n0
does.