> My understanding of the whole thing is, that a) m0n0wall is a completely
> different approach to the whole firewall thing than pfSense: m0n0wall is
> meant for lean&mean systems, where pfSense wants to be a full featured
> product. So, each of both has it's right to exist.
> b) is, that having m0n0wall running with FreeBSD 6.1 brings the
> advantage of much more hardware support, which alone is worth the work
> in my eyes.
If this is the case, isn't the quickest way of getting m0n0wall on
FreeBSD 6.1 just to cut out everything that pfSense has added until it
has feature parity with current m0n0wall?