No experience with WRAP and VPN endpoint on this list??

-J

On 8/30/06, Jimmy Bones (Mhottie) <mhottie at gmail dot com> wrote:
>
> So, the questions still stands, will m0n0 handle 5 public ips the way I
> want it to in this instance. And will it act as a VPN endpoint the way I am
> looking for?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -J
>
> On 8/29/06, Steve Thomas <sthomas at consultant dot com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Sure Jimmy!
> >
> > >>what would work best given the use?
> >
> > You could use the same config I suggested.
> > Keep the Dlink for the web server, and use m0n0wall for the LAN.
> >
> > If they need to upload code to the web server, they could just use
> > RDP (forward 3389 through the Dlink).
> >
> > I always do whatever I can to avoid double NAT configs and just
> > have the web server on it's own network.
> >
> >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jimmy Bones (Mhottie)" < mhottie at gmail dot com>
> > > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > > Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Multiple Public WAN IPs and VPN endpoint.
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:21:32 -0400
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you, Steve.
> > >
> > > I should have mentioned, it is a small network used primarily for
> > in-house
> > > development of VB, and web apps. They use all servers internally for
> > > different things, then want the webserver to have it's own public IP
> > because
> > > they host these apps for testing. Aside from the errors of having code
> > on a
> > > public machine, and multi using servers (these aren't things that are
> > going
> > > to change) what would work best given the use?
> > >
> > > They currentlly have the cable modem going to a crappy d-link router
> > that
> > > then port forwards 80 -> web server. So they are only using 1 of their
> > 5 ips
> > > right now (for the Dlink, everything else is NAT) and want to utilize
> > more
> > > of them.
> > >
> > > -J
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>