[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jurgen van Vliet" <jurgenvv at xs4all dot nl>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible?
 Date:  Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:36:52 +0200
Hi guys,

Two questions come to my mind

1) What is the current working max users and how much memory would it
require ?
2) What would be "appropriate" funding ? :)

Regards,

Jurgen

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan De Graeve [mailto:Jonathan dot DeGraeve at imelda dot be] 
Sent: maandag 4 september 2006 10:40
To: John Gar; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible?

If somebody does the appropriate funding I will be happy to rewrite
everything to an OO infrastructure which will make threading of the captive
portal possible. In that case it will certainly be possible to handle 50k
users (although it will be without mac locking) and I don't know the maximum
ruleset for a BSD based system. But for the moment, not yet... I'm in the
way of moving to such an infrastructure.

PS even a Cisco doesn't handle this atm. I know only one system that is able
of handling 100k users but its not public available yet and it runs on
linux. It is from a guy who works at my old university (KULeuven) and
consists of at least 2hardware boxes. (router/login-logout frontend
server)

Can I ask for which situation you need to handle 50k users?

Kind Regards,

J.

--
Jonathan De Graeve
Network/System Engineer
Imelda vzw
Informatica Dienst
+32 15/50.52.98
jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be

---------
Always read the manual for the correct way to do things because the number
of incorrect ways to do things is almost infinite
---------

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: John Gar [mailto:begood at gmail dot com]
> Verzonden: maandag 4 september 2006 8:04
> Aan: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Onderwerp: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible?
> 
> I need to support session control for 50,000 concurrent users using 
> MAC RADIUS authentication and up/down bandwidth throttling. For the 
> task I have no Dual CPU Dual core XEON 3.0GHZ/4MB (4 way).
> I don't need any firewall rules, except redirecting users to an 
> activation portal where they can add their MAC address (no 
> user/password login is needed).
> 
> Can m0n0wall do the job? I read somewhere it can only use one
CPU/Core.
> 
> Also I need to add CARP (but not pfsynch). How difficult is that?
> I looked at pfSense too, but the current version will no do MAC auth, 
> will not process RADIUS bandwidth reply attributes,  and I do need to 
> shape upload too, which  ALTQ wont.
> 
> /John
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch