|
||||||||
Hi Can Censornet take this load. I found LMS (Lan Management System), but not sure handling this load. Regards, -bs sawant >From: "Alex M" <radiussupport at lrcommunications dot net> >To: "'liran tal'" <liransgarage at gmail dot com>,"'Jonathan De Graeve'" ><Jonathan dot DeGraeve at imelda dot be>,<m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>,"'John Gar'" ><begood at gmail dot com> >Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible? >Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:30:06 -0400 > >I didn't really read full discussion, but I would never put 50k users on >one >box, I would rather do decentralized sub networks for your location... + I >highly would doubt that you can have 50k user in one physical location so >its better in my opinion have multiple network, more reliable and redundant >in case of failure... (If I repeated some one, sorry didn't read >everything >:-P > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: liran tal [mailto:liransgarage at gmail dot com] >Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:49 AM >To: Jonathan De Graeve; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch; John Gar >Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible? > >I'm thinking the pitfalls are probably: > * The firewall rules limit that BSD allows (if there is any) > * If the httpd would be able to handle the load of requests for >authentication and such > * The through-put of the box. 50k is alot, even if every client is only >receiving 256kbit/512kbit which is a > minimum speed requirement by end-users these days. > >Nice thinking about the OO port Jonathan. > >On 9/4/06, Jonathan De Graeve <Jonathan dot DeGraeve at imelda dot be> wrote: > > > > If somebody does the appropriate funding I will be happy to rewrite > > everything to an OO infrastructure which will make threading of the > > captive portal possible. In that case it will certainly be possible to > > handle 50k users (although it will be without mac locking) and I don't > > know the maximum ruleset for a BSD based system. But for the moment, not > > yet... I'm in the way of moving to such an infrastructure. > > > > PS even a Cisco doesn't handle this atm. I know only one system that is > > able of handling 100k users but its not public available yet and it runs > > on linux. It is from a guy who works at my old university (KULeuven) and > > consists of at least 2hardware boxes. (router/login-logout frontend > > server) > > > > Can I ask for which situation you need to handle 50k users? > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > J. > > > > -- > > Jonathan De Graeve > > Network/System Engineer > > Imelda vzw > > Informatica Dienst > > +32 15/50.52.98 > > jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be > > > > --------- > > Always read the manual for the correct way to do things because the > > number of incorrect ways to do things is almost infinite > > --------- > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: John Gar [mailto:begood at gmail dot com] > > > Verzonden: maandag 4 september 2006 8:04 > > > Aan: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > Onderwerp: [m0n0wall] 50K concurrent users - possible? > > > > > > I need to support session control for 50,000 concurrent users using > > > MAC RADIUS authentication and up/down bandwidth throttling. For the > > > task I have no Dual CPU Dual core XEON 3.0GHZ/4MB (4 way). > > > I don't need any firewall rules, except redirecting users to an > > > activation portal where they can add their MAC address (no > > > user/password login is needed). > > > > > > Can m0n0wall do the job? I read somewhere it can only use one > > CPU/Core. > > > > > > Also I need to add CARP (but not pfsynch). How difficult is that? > > > I looked at pfSense too, but the current version will no do MAC auth, > > > will not process RADIUS bandwidth reply attributes, and I do need to > > > shape upload too, which ALTQ wont. > > > > > > /John > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > _________________________________________________________________ The next best thing! Messenger Video Conversation. Click here! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview2000 |