[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Mark Spieth" <mspieth at neod dot net>
 To:  <joshmccormack at travelersdiary dot com>, "M0N0Wall firewall" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Feature request which would make m0n0wall even better ;)
 Date:  Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:25:22 -0500
It only needs 1 nic. The most secure option would be a DMZ, this way if
the box is hacked, they don't have access to anything on the corporate
lan. But having it in the green is much better than having it on the
firewall its self.

-----Original Message-----
From: joshmccormack at travelersdiary dot com
[mailto:joshmccormack at travelersdiary dot com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 11:21 AM
To: M0N0Wall firewall
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Feature request which would make m0n0wall even
better ;)

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Mark Spieth wrote:


<snip>
> manage and that's where I have a problem. You want NTP etc.. Go buy a
> $25.00 PII300 used box and run NTP behind your firewall, no guarantee
it
> won't get hacked, But your chances are much better than running it,
> samba and a whole mess of other things on your box...
> 
OK, so lets say you have a seperate box, you're using as a file server,
print server, NTP, SAMBA, Squid, etc. Has a harddrive. Would it need
more than 1 nic? Should be behind the firewall (not in DMZ)?

Josh


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch