[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Bjoern Euler <lists at edain dot de>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Cc:  Brian Ertel <bsertel at amherst dot edu>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] monowall to monowall IPSEC VPN
 Date:  Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:31:11 +0200 
On 20.09.2006 17:02 Brian Ertel wrote:
> RH LAN: monowall
> 
> Network: 148.85.158.16/29
> LAN Int:  148.85.158.17
> WAN Int: 148.85.158.25 (connects to VLAN 358 148.85.158.26 /29 on Cisco 6509)
> 
> AC LAN: monowall
> 
> Network: 148.85.158.8/29
> LAN int: 148.85.158.9
> WAN int: 148.85.158.1 (connects to VLAN 157 148.85.158.2 /29 on Cisco 6509)

What subnets are the LAN and WAN interfaces on either box. Are they 
using the same address range? Is it requirement that WAN/LAN side of 
either box use the same adress range?
Seems like a routing problem to me.

-Bjoern