[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Bryan K. Brayton" <bryan at sonicburst dot net>
 Cc:  "m0n0wall" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Transparent public IP subnets
 Date:  Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:32:42 -0400
You've definitely got outbound NAT set up for those links.  You don't want it set up for those
networks, you only want it for your LAN network, right?  You need to delete those NAT mappings if
you want it to be routed.  And you need to create one for your LAN network range.
Also, just to be clear, your ISP did route you those networks, correct?


From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:lists at webtent dot net]
Sent: Tue 10/3/2006 11:53 AM
To: Bryan K. Brayton
Cc: m0n0wall
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Transparent public IP subnets

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 11:36 -0400, Bryan K. Brayton wrote:
> That does sound like it is NATing the OPT interfaces.  So, the question is, what do you have for
outbound NAT rules?

Take a look, I guess it does not matter, there is only my Linux laptop
connected to the switch with OPT2 network as a test, you can see the
config I have...all outbound traffic permitted in rules on the OPT2 int
just like the LAN and the advanced outbound NAT setup for each public IP

This does mean that m0n0wall is translating the address, correct? I'm
just trying to find a way to make the m0n0wall transparent. Thanks for
the help!