> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:52 AM
> Cc: Monowall Mailing list
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] monowall vs pfsense captive portal
> On 10/18/06, List Receiver <listreceiver at mastermindpro dot com> wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen this behavior. No one over on the pfSense dev list
> > seems to acknowledge it, though...they say they just port
> the CP code
> > from m0n0. I have no idea why it is this way.
> It's completely, totally, identically, 100% the same code. I
> don't use it on either, so I can't vouch for the speed or
> lack thereof.
Then perhaps the problem lies outside the CP code?