|
||||||||
I tested by calling Polycom and they connected into the our cameras. I also tested our polycom by connecting to their testing units with no problems. If I recall correctly I had to open a couple of specific ports, and then a range of ports. I also am assuming you have opened the correct firewall rules? It did take me about two weeks because of some stupid little mistake, but it did work. I am in the middle of moving next week and getting my file server back up and running. I will try to find a copy of the working config file and let you see what I did. Since it was a while ago I can't really remember exactly what I did. It would also be helpful to know which equipment you are using and also get a copy of the instructions for them. You can mail me off list. Ethan Joe Perkins wrote: > The video conferencing unit behind the Monowall is able to: > 1.) Send Video and Audio > 2.) Receive Audio > > but the unit cannot receive incoming video. > > This is with a 1:1 NAT mapping to the conferencing unit and with all > ports open. > > This problem has been consistent with all types of video conferencing > equipment from a variety of manufacturers. > > I am thinking that the problem arises due to H.323 dynamically assigning > ports. (Although I have not tried it, it is possible that two Polycoms > connecting to one another would be ok, since they would not negotiate a > session using dynamic ports). If so, the problem is similar to passive > FTP transfers via a Monowall, meaning that we need a bit of IPfilter > help??? > > Joe Perkins > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ethan Bonick [mailto:ethan at networkinggeeks dot com] > Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 8:53 PM > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] H.323 and video Conferencing > > What kind of problems are you having with H.323? I had monowall working > with some video polycom cameras a couple years ago. I never tested the > audio but the video was working great. This was the only firewall I > could find att eh time that supported H.323. > > Ethan > > Joe Perkins wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I am wondering if the port to BSD 6 will enable the use of H.323 video >> conferencing. I believe the current problem in supporting H.323 >> revolves around a lack of support for newer versions of IPfilter, >> although I am not certain. >> >> >> >> Joe Perkins >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > |